The INTERNATIONAL FOSSIL PLANT NAMES INDEX
Global registry of scientific names of fossil organisms covered by the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants and the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature © 2014-2024

IDNAME urn:idName:ifpni.org:genus:8F4AFEAC-6E2E-46B8-A19C-DBEDA0FB41DA genus
Back

Taeniopteris

Genus Taeniopteris Brongn. Prodr. Hist. Vég. Foss. 61. Dec 1828
Name
Taeniopteris
Rank
Genus
Replaced Name
[Genus] p-Taeniopteris
Authors (Pub.)
Brongniart A. T.  
Publication
Prodrome d'une histoire des végétaux fossiles [1828/12]
Authors (Book)
Brongniart A. T.  
Book
Prodrome d'une histoire des végétaux fossiles
Page number
61
Year
1828
Parent Taxon
[Family] Bennettitaceae
Fossil Status
foliage
Type
Taeniopteris vittata
Links by parent

Infragenus


Species
Show all
Nomenclatural synonyms

Genus

Links by generics

Infragenus


Species
Show all
Infraspecies


Links by type

Supragenus

User comments

  • Doweld Alexander at: 05/11/2015 22:09

    When originally established in 1828 with a distinct diagnosis and three listed species, Taeniopteris was a nomenclaturally superfluous illegitimate name, as it included the type of the previously and validly published monotypic fossil generic name Marantoidea Jaeger, M. arenacea Jaeger (Pfl.-Versteiner.: 28, t. 5, fig. 5. 15–22 Sep 1827). It is unclear why Brongniart overlooked the fact that he included a previously established monotypic genus in his newly formed one, recognizing it as a merely variety of his new species, T. vittata var. major Brongn. (l.c.: 194. 1828), making both Taeniopteris and T. vittata superfluous and illegitimate. Later Brongniart (Hist. Vég. Foss. 1: 362. 28 Mar 1836) designated T. vittata as type of Taeniopteris (although his action was meaningless as the type of Taeniopteris is that of Marantoidea), his new choice (again repeated by Miller, N. Amer. Geol. Palaeontol.: 146. 1889) was overlooked by subsequent palaeobotanists. Under modern rules of nomenclature, to maintain T. vittata as type of Taeniopteris as is currently applied is possible by two conservation proposals, that of Taeniopteris with T. vittata as type, but also that of T. vittata itself with a conserved type; see formal proposals by Doweld (in TAXON 62 (6) • (2249–2250) Conserve Taeniopteris and T. vittata December 2013: 1348–1349).

Please login or register to comment on this